Before a Model UN conference, where my committee grappled with the ethics of drone warfare, I, like many, saw drones as nothing more than instruments of destruction. This simplistic view, born from naivete, was challenged when I was assigned to represent Colombia, a nation actively employing drones for purposes beyond the battlefield, including the controversial practice of illicit crop eradication. Initially, I felt a sense of unease. However, I understood my duty was to faithfully represent Colombia's position, regardless of my personal biases.

Through deep immersion in research, I discovered that Colombia prized drones for their precision and effectiveness in combating drug production. This newfound understanding broadened my perspective. Drones, I realized, possessed the potential to transcend their destructive capabilities and serve as tools for good, even saving lives.  In hindsight, I recognized the naiveté of my initial perception, limited by a narrow understanding of their diverse applications.

Inspired, I delved into the intricacies of drone fumigation in Colombia's fight against illicit coca cultivation. My findings illuminated the transformative potential of this technology, offering a glimmer of hope in ending a decades-long crisis. Driven by this revelation, I expanded my research to explore the applicability of drone technology in addressing Myanmar's opium crisis. This exploration, examining the potential of drones to combat drug production in both nations, ultimately garnered international recognition.

This experience forced me to confront the limitations of my own perspective.  Just as overcoming a challenge can reveal hidden strengths,  understanding the constraints of my initial biases allowed me to see the multifaceted nature of drone technology. By embracing this new perspective, I was able to transcend the simplistic and often clichéd view of drones as mere weapons, and instead, appreciate their potential for positive change.